Has the Promised One returned?

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

It looks like Isildur1 is making a comeback, as the blogs have been all a-twitter about some Isildur1 sightings in low stakes games at Full Tilt Poker. There are also rumors that the mystery man is playing at Betfair Poker as Omlphalotus, which is a much harder name to discuss around the Poker.com offices than Isildur1 (seriously, how is that pronounced?). Omlphalotus apparently plays just like Isildur1, including the disastrous habit of foolishly long sessions, and those in the know are reasonably sure it's our favorite high stakes maniac.

Isildur1's return to Full Tilt has been anything but glorious. He's playing $0.25/$0.50 stakes games of No Limit Hold 'Em, his game of choice, which is a hell of a long way from his previous games. At the end of last year he was risking hundreds of thousands of dollars on every second hand, you have to wonder if he will ever make a return to that level of play.

It's also slightly troubling that's he's sticking to NLHE games, as it was Pot Limit Omaha where he was losing big money to the pros. They know not to take him on in NLHE, so you'd think he would work on the game he's most likely to play the pros at. Oh well. Maybe he's simply working on restoring his initial bankroll, but I'm worried Isildur1 hasn't learnt anything from his prior experiences at the high roller tables.

Welcome back Isildur1. Hope you can get back in the swing of things (though perhaps don't let your bankroll do the swinging this time).

Do you think Isildur1 will return to the glory of the high stakes tables, and how do you think he would do now? Tell us about it in the comments.

- Shad


Posted at 1:52 AM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Aussie Millions' PartyPoker Champ

Monday, February 01, 2010

It was crazy enough that not one, but two PartyPoker qualifiers managed to make it to the Aussie Millions Final Table. Now, the new tournament champion has been named: PartyPoker's Tyron Krost.

Krost was one of 27 rounders that managed to win their way to the Aussie Millions via PartyPoker qualifiers. Alongside him at the Final Table was fellow PartyPoker member Frederik Jensen.

With a top prize of $2 million on offer for the ultimate winner, Krost and Jensen faced the likes of Canadian Sorel Mizzi, Steve Friedlander, and even WSOPE bracelet-winning Annette Obrestad. After days of intense play, the 23-year-old university student finally came out on top.

Amazingly, even up against Sorel Mizzi's chip lead of $6 million, both PartyPoker qualifiers were the last remaining competitors. Krost ended up taking the honors, but Jensen didn't walk away empty-handed, pocketing $1.1 million for his efforts.

Krost managed to turn a meager satellite entrance fee into $2 million thanks to PartyPoker, and it's intriguing to see just how many satellite qualifiers are managing to pull off remarkable finishes in the big tournaments.

It's not the first time that something like this has happened; who could forget the way Chris Moneymaker - arguably the man that popularized mainstream poker - managed to win his way from an online satellite all the way to the World Series of Poker Main Event in 2003.

It's a familiar story, and one we will doubtless hear time and time again as the popularity of online poker and online gambling in general increases.

Have you taken part in - or even won - any satellite events such as PartyPoker's Aussie Millions promotion? What are you thoughts on the way that qualifiers are bridging the gap between at-home poker players and well-known professionals? Have your say in the comments below!


Posted at 1:44 AM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Ivey: All-Time Money Earner

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

The Aussie Millions may have dealt Phil Ivey a cruel blow on Monday, but his runner-up finish in the $100k Challenge Monday was enough to push the Full Tilt Poker Pro over the line as the all-time leading money winner.

Touted as the "richest tournament in the Southern Hemisphere", the Aussie Millions event saw Ivey lose heads-up against relative unknown Dan Shak. Ivey's hand of A/10 was trumped on the flop when Shak picked up two pair of sevens and fours, proving to be the decider. While Shak took away double Phil Ivey's prize money, the legendary Full Tilt Pro still managed to pick up AU$600,000 for his troubles.

That event pushed his career earnings to over US$12.8 million, more than $350,000 ahead of former leader Daniel Negreanu. Ivey was excited about the achievement, but nonchalant about its implications.

"It's exciting. I've been after that for a while now, so it feels good to get there."

"I don't think I'll celebrate too much," he said. "I'm just going to go to dinner, maybe have a glass of wine or two and play some poker later."

With plenty of poker action coming up, we may very well see the leaderboard continue to change. What do you think of Phil Ivey's recent ascension to the top of the all-time money earners? And do you think he's likely to stay there for some time to come? Have your say in the comments!

- TheDoctor


Posted at 11:51 PM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Twitter at WSOP 2010

Sunday, January 17, 2010

The 2010 WSOP Tournament Rule Book has been released, and it has a few choice entries. One of the best is that people will be allowed to use Twitter and make emails, as long as they do so in a hand they are not a part of, and as long as they aren't communicating with other players at the table. If the tournament staff believe you are communicating with another player, then you and the person you were giving helpful hints to will be disqualified. Also, people may only make calls on a phone as long as they are at least one table length away from the table they are playing at. All seem fair, and quite progressive really. Allowing Twitter especially could make for better press coverage and public interest.

Some other intriguing rules include a rule for "no shows", where a player who does not show up before the start of the third level of play will have their chips and buy-in removed from the tournament. Players who do not make it on time and are withdrawn will not be penalized, which has caused controversy, as some suspect players will try to scope out their table before showing up to see if it is worth their time playing.

The most entertaining rule, of course, is Rule No. 91, which is constantly referred to when a penalty is mentioned in some other rules. This is a bit funny because Rule 91 reads:

"There will be no foreign objects on the table except for a maximum of one card cap. Card caps can be no larger than two (2) inches in diameter and no more than one-half (1/2) inch in depth. Players may not place any food or beverages on the poker table with the exception of one (1) capped bottle of water."

Hmmm. That doesn't sound like a penalty, does it? Now, Rule 92, on the other hand, starts off with the following line:

"In its sole and absolute discretion, Rio may impose penalties ranging from a verbal warning, one missed hand away from the table up to disqualification and expulsion from all Rio casino properties."

Sounds more appropriate. Mistakes like this happen, and I'm sure that will be attended to soon enough. If not, we may see people who flout the rules get penalized with a direction to place one (1) capped bottle of water on the table. Or something like that.

Do you have any thoughts on the 2010 World Series of Poker rules? Please tell us about it in the comments.

- Shad


Posted at 7:17 PM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Isildur1: A Timeline

Friday, January 15, 2010


In November and December of 2009, the mysterious Swedish player Isildur1 tore up the felt on the high limit tables at Full Tilt Poker. During this period, Isildur1 took part in the 12 richest online hands in poker history up to that point, including being part of the first online hand to surpass the $1 million mark. The following is a rough timeline of Isildur1's highs and lows from November 2009 through to the beginning of 2010.

Early November - Isildur1 was gaining a reputation at this point for his utter decimation of Tom "Durrrr" Dwan, with a $3 million profit from Dwan making headlines on the poker news sites. Luckily for Dwan, he got picked up as part of Team Full Tilt soon after. Isildur1 had also been destroying a few other pros in No Limit Hold 'Em, and they had responded by running away to the Pot Limit Omaha tables, where Isildur1 did not seem to have an advantage.

Isildur1 wanted more victims, however. He took $162,000 from Phil "OMGClayAiken" Galfond, and set his sights on Patrik Antonius in the same night, taking $686,000 from Antonius in a PLO game and even managing to squeeze $22,000 out of Phil Ivey.

Late November - The latter part of November started out with Isildur1 having taken about $1.5 million from Patrik Antonius, and $1 million from David Benyamine, in addition to the massive wins he had against Dwan. People began to suspect that Isildur1 was Victor Blom, though this is discounted by many sources, including Blom himself.

Isildur1 made headlines with Patrik Antonius on November 16th when they broke the record for the biggest-ever online poker hand at $878,958.50. This was part of a session where Isildur1 lost around $2.9 million to Antonius. Brian Townsend sweetened this bitter pill by losing $440,000 or so to Isildur1 on the same night, though.

A few days later, on the evening of November 21st, the two broke the biggest hand record again and managed to be the first players to be part of an online poker hand worth more than $1 million. Unfortunately for Isildur1, it is yet again in Patrik Antonius' favor, with the $1,356,946 hand going to the former model. Total losses to Antonius that night ran up to $2.1 million for Isildur1, with a further $1.2 million going to Phil Ivey.

Isildur1 recovered somewhat at this point with more big wins against Tom Dwan and Phil Sahamies. He also managed to take a $1.1 million pot against Phil Ivey, a story that would surely get Isildur1 free drinks for the rest of his life if he ever decides to reveal himself. Unfortunately, even taking that massive hand did not put Isildur1 ahead for the session, as Ivey left $300,000 richer.

Closing out the month of November, Isildur1 managed to reclaim some of his lost cash from Antonius again, and a player known as DjAdi. DjAdi added $160,000 to Isildur1's bank, and Antonius lost enough for Isildur1 to take away $667,000 in profit for a night's work. It's too bad that, soon after, a $1.5 million loss to Ilari "Ziigmund" Sahamies and a loss of $566,000 to Brian Townsend bit further into Isildur1's profits.

Early December - The troubles from the end of November continued for Isildur1 in December. He was well and truly on his way to downfall in his first run at the high stakes Full Tilt Poker tables, especially when Brian Hastings took more than $3.2 million from him in a single five hour long session. It may be the worst single session anyone has had in online poker, and completely undid all the work of Isildur1 in the days prior - a three day stretch of fortune that gave him $4.35 million for a tragically short time.

Around this period, Patrik Antonius made some very complimentary comments about Isildur1 and his playing style, but a few nice words did nothing to help the mystery Swede to start turning a profit again. Brian Hastings gave his own analysis of Isildur1, coming to the conclusion that Isildur1 plays for too long and is too obsessed with trying to turn a losing match around. Chat logs between Isildur1 and other players during this time certainly suggest that he wasn't immune to tilting.

Late December - As the year began to close, Isildur1 dropped down to lower stakes. He still had no luck in recovering his money, however, as Cole South got $238,000 from yet another incredibly long playing session for Isildur1. It's possible that Isildur1 may have been chasing his rival Tom Dwan, who had already gone down to lower stakes, but Cole South acted as something of a buffer, winning against Isildur1, but losing some massive pots to Dwan.

In an interview with ESPN, Brian Hastings revealed he and Brian Townsend had discussed Isildur1's playing style, including the use of a 50,000 hand history compiled by Townsend. This led Isildur1 to seek compensation from Full Tilt Poker, after Brian Townsend's Red Pro status was suspended from Full Tilt for 30 days. Cole South was also implicated in gaining insight on Isildur1's play from Townsend, and he was the last beneficiary of Isildur1's dying gasps against the pros at Full Tilt.

It appeared that Isildur1 had gone bust, as he was nowhere to be found through the end of the year. As 2010 began, Tony G stated he would be willing to stake Isildur1 in some major events, and an interview with the Isildur1 revealed that he intended to return and still had a bankroll to play with. His initial glory run at Full Tilt Poker had ended, however, with losses in excess of $1 million. We can only hope he will come back having learned a few lessons. The most important one of all would be to stop taking on fresh high stakes players in 5 hour long sessions after having already played for 9 hours straight.

Are you looking forward to the second run of Isildur1? Fans of the mystery player should sound off in the comments.

- Shad


Posted at 1:35 AM Permalink | 1 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Synched Tourney Breaks

Friday, January 08, 2010


The introduction of synchronized tournament breaks has swept the world of online poker, with many different poker networks jumping on the bandwagon. What's most interesting is that many of them have chosen to break at the same time - 55 minutes past the hour, for 5 minutes, or simply to the top of the hour.

Poker sites that synchronize their breaks in this way include Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars, Ultimate Bet, Absolute Poker, Cake Poker, and recently Carbon Poker. Most of these sites make exceptions for tourneys that have only recently started, except for Cake Poker, which has elected to maintain the 55 minutes past the hour rule regardless of how little time the tournament has been running for, though they are excluding Sit and Go tournaments with fewer than 30 players from break synchronization.

It's really good to see the poker rooms deciding to break at the same time, and not being jerks about people who might play at multiple rooms at once. Not everyone is some incredible savant player who can do well in any game at any stakes and with any conditions - some people have a niche that requires they play only in specific tournament conditions at specific stakes if they are to do well. For these specialist players trying to make some money by playing in tourneys at multiple sites simultaneously, the synchronization of breaks must be a godsend.

What do you think about poker rooms synchronizing tournament breaks at the same time? Please tell us in the comments.

-Shad


Posted at 12:51 AM Permalink | 1 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Why The Bitterness Toward XBLINK?

Monday, January 04, 2010


I've been reading about how XBLINK turned the last $11 in his account into more than $800,000, hitting more than $100,000 in just 5 days. That's pretty interesting, but what's more interesting to me is the poorly disguised bitterness of some players in response to this ridiculous miracle. In the forum thread where '89blist' - who identified himself as XBLINK - detailed how he made his quick fortune, many players have been harshly criticizing him.

I don't want to focus entirely on the negative, as most people are obviously happy to see someone do so well in such a short period of time. I mean, that's an awesome story, right? From your last $11 in your account to more than $800,000? Sure, the guy got lucky, but the short-term game of poker relies on luck. Phil Ivey couldn't turn $11 into more than $100,000 in 5 days unless the cards were really on his side, so why would anyone expect that a complete poker nobody would have achieved this on professional, carefully considered play?

Sure, we all think he's going to lose it all playing at far higher limits than his skills will allow for. Yes, we are all probably right. However, is it really necessary to tell him he's going to bust out soon or go broke? Is it appropriate to wish him ill? He's won a whole bunch of money, and he's young enough that it's almost a given he'll screw up and lose a bunch of it, but so what? Why the hate?

I know a lot of people are thinking they'd handle his bankroll better if they ever built up such a massive bank. Well, if you were that careful with your bankroll, then you'd never manage to make that much so quickly from $11, as you wouldn't take the risks that XBLINK has taken. It's easy to feel bitter when some young gun manages to go on a perversely long and successful hot streak, especially if you've been playing and improving for years without anywhere near as much success. It's easy to feel that way, but doesn't that bitterness just suck the fun out of poker?

How do you feel about stories like this? Love to hear them, but hate the players? Or just love to hear them? Tell us how you feel in the comments.

-Shad


Posted at 2:07 AM Permalink | 1 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum

Powered by Blogger