Why not?

Friday, September 30, 2005

I'm going to have a crack at the Online Blogger Championship seeing as Poker Stars did this before I got around to it. Providing they let me that is.... C'mon guys - you won't mind if Poker.com plays in your tourney will you?

Us Poker.commers (think i just created a new word - does anyone have a better suggestion for our collective staff nickname?) have to play somewhere, seeing as we can't play at our own beloved site. Where do we play usually? Well I haven't played at Poker Stars much - but I know they run good tournaments. I don't love their software and their players are tough so I will probably never be a super regular player, but I would recommend their site as being in the Top 3 out there simply due to their quality of players online and their seemingly fair approach to all things poker. The other two in the top 3 sites that Poker.commers play at? I might tell you that some other time......

All bloggers have to apply to enter the Online Blogger Championship, then post this code on your blog so Poker Stars can see that you really are the blogger you claim to be. Get amongst it!


Poker Championship

I have registered to play in the
Online Poker Blogger Championship!

This event is powered by PokerStars.

Registration code: 8443667



Maybe we'll just have to do it monthly when I launch our blogger freerolls. ;)

Kris @ Poker.com


Posted at 7:38 AM Permalink | 3 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Bullitpete from Barcelona

Thursday, September 29, 2005

Earlier this month, regular Poker.com players, Bullitpete & FoxyUk flew across the channel to Barcelona, Spain to play in a European Poker Tour main event. Here is Bullitpete's rundown of how the event panned out.

European Poker Tour - Barcelona
Myself and FoxyUK arrive in Barcelona with the intention of playing the two 1000 euro no limit events, the 500 euro rebuy and the 4000 euro EPT main event.

With FoxyUK already qualified for the EPT he could put his feet up whilst I had to play the 200 rebuy satellite. Foxy printed the start times off the internet and told me the event started at 6 pm. So I get to the casino just before 6pm only to see that the tournament clock is already on level 3 and there were only 3 more hands to be played until the end of the rebuy period!

So I quickly bought in, added on, and won my the pot on my first hand! After 5 hands I'm about averagely stacked with chips and am rather pleased with my new 'late arrival' strategy. Then after a few more hands I find myself with pocket kings - which after raising I get only one caller. With a flop of 10, 6, 4, I decide to check-raise the caller allin. He was extremely happy with this move as he was holding trip tens and I was out!

Being down 600 euro, with only 20 minutes of tournament play under my belt meant that this was not such a great start to the trip after all.

The next day Foxy and myself got down to the tournament area on time. Foxy made an early exit after having falin in love with ace/jack again! If you see him around you have to ask him about the problem he has with the AJ. ..

I made it down to the last 30 of 140 runners but found it difficult towards the end of the tourney with a cold deck. I finished on the bubble just outside the money.

The number of entrants for the second 1000 euro buyin had doubled as all the poker faces had appeared in preparation for the main event. Devilfish, Marcel Luske , Gus Hansen, Krill to name but a few.

Play started and we both experienced the 'balls of steel' from the Swedish kids - not one of them over the age of 25.... I was knocked out when one of the Swedes decided to re-raise me all in preflop with 10,6 off suit. I was only holding King Queen so I would normally have folded, but the guy looked so uncomfortable I knew that I had him. When the flop came Ace Jack five, he could only win by hitting the 6 ...........and of course the river was a 6. Foxy lasted a bit longer but end up finishing just outside the money.

The main event.
Foxy drew a tough table sat between The Devilfish and Isabelle 'No Mercy' Mercier. The rest of his table was packed with 21 year old swedes. He was shown a big bluff early on by one of these kids and it really hurt him. With steam flowing from my his ears and a face scrunched like an English bulldog he tried to avoid the TILT that the whole table was gearing for. He calmed down and played his short stack well and picked some small pots to get back up to average chips (16k). However it ended badly when he got all his money in with a 50/50 shot of AQ vs pocket 4s which ended badly.

The Devilfish was shown a similar bluff by one of these Swedes to which he said ' so u wanna tell your mom that you made a move on the Devilfish. But when she asks you were you finished you'll still have to say emm.........nowhere mom!' . It appeared that the bluff annoyed Devilfish so much that a few hands later he made a bad call which knocked him out of the tournament, which I thought was suprising for such a seasoned pro.

Overall it was a great trip, but there was no love for us from the Poker gods. Now we have to concentrate on winning a seat to the Aussie Millions at Poker.com!

Bullitpete - A Poker.com Player


Posted at 10:25 PM Permalink | 2 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Win a seat to the Aussie Millions!

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

This week Poker.com is starting satellites that give our players a chance to win a trip down under to play in the $10,000 buyin (+ $500) Crown Casino Australian Poker Championships Main Event, or 'Aussie Millions' as it has become affectionately known.

Paul & I went to the Aussie Millions for the first time last year and it really was a great tournament. This year it's held during the same weeks as the Australian Open Grand Slam Tennis Championship and World Series Cricket matches between Australia, South Africa & Sri Lanka. Melbourne really is buzzing at that time of year. Last year there were Poker pros, cricketers and Tennis pros everywhere. Some of the big names we met (or shared a hotel lift or pool with at least) included Marcel Luske, Scotty Nguyen, Mike Sexton, Tony Bloom, The Hendon Mob, Maria Sharapova, Venus & Serena Williams, Andy Roddick, Lleyton Hewitt, Roger Federer, Shane Warne & the list goes on...

Melbourne is also the home town poker room of current WSOP champ, Joe Hachem, who will be playing in the event.

The Crown Casino is a world class hotel and casino and is rumoured to be a future destination of either a WPT or WSOP Australian stop. I didn't realise that it is actually the 4th biggest casino in the world. It is massive, but I was surprised that it matches up to the size of the massive Las Vegas strip casinos. It is owned by one of Australia's richest men and biggest gamblers, Kerry Packer and as their website says, "Few hotels in the world can match this level of opulence and excitement. If you’re seeking luxury in Melbourne, Crown Towers is the hotel for you." It is a special hotel and the only place to be in January 2006.

The package we've put together for our satellite winners makes for a great trip.
- a $10,000 + $500 seat in the main event
- Flights and spending money up to $3000
- 8 nights in the luxury Crown Towers Hotel
- Warm up freeroll in the Crown Casino Poker Room
- Tickets to the Australian Open Tennis
- Poker.com Merchandise & Apparel
- Dinner with the Poker.com crew and maybe even get to meet the Poker.com Queen...

So check out the satellite details and get started trying to win your spot. With chances from $1, how can you afford not to!

Good Luck! Hope to see you down under!

Kris @ Poker.com


Posted at 9:20 AM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


'Online Poker Isn't Rigged' article

Monday, September 26, 2005

I've been reading Bill Rini's poker blog lately and today he posted a great article giving some reasons as to why online poker isn't rigged.

I have to deal with a lot of the emails claiming that the game is not fair, cards are rigged etc etc and to be 100% honest it is one my least favorite and most frustrating, but very necessary tasks at Poker.com. (Hi to everyone who has received one of my friendly 'I respect your opinion, but you don't know what you are talking about' emails!)

It comes down to having a basic knowledge of probability and an understanding of the business of online Poker, but sometimes it can be very difficult to concisely explain to your average player why we would never 'rig' cards.

I'll let Bill fill you in some more - click here to read his article.

kris @ poker.com


Posted at 5:51 AM Permalink | 1 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


High-stakes poker at the Bellagio

I have played no online poker for the past week, but before you begin to lose faith in my unquenchable desire to play poker whenever possible, let me explain: I went on a pilgrimage to Las Vegas, my Mecca, enjoying the hospitality of Poker.com when they hosted a magnificent party at the Venetian, and testing my abilities at the Bellagio’s poker room. On Tuesday I decided to enter the $500 + $40 no-limit hold’em tournament held by the Bellagio, even though that’s a big buy-in for me, and I happened to notice at least two grizzled veterans of the World Series Of Poker were competing against me. It wasn’t all that hard to notice because they were both at my table, and one, “Minneapolis” Jim Meehan, was fortunate enough to be seated to my left, enabling him to beat up on me at will. The other, Tomer Benvenisti, whom you might remember as the guy who came 5th in the Main Event at the WSOP in 2003, Moneymaker’s event, was across from me. There were 50 opponents in all, and many of them were faces you would recognize from high-limit tables that I can barely afford to watch never mind sit down at.

There was a surly poker pro from Norway, two girls who had played in numerous WSOP events a couple of months ago, and thankfully also a handful of rank amateurs who had never entered a poker tournament before and wanted to see what all the fuss was about. They lasted all of twenty minutes, and probably still have no idea what all the fuss is about. Jim Meehan, who won a bracelet for no-limit hold’em at the 2003 WSOP and who carves up poker pros for a living, schooled me for the first hour of the event, during which my main goal became one of survival. There were weak players at my table and the guys with world series bracelets were not them. I needed to focus on the poker virgins and avoid the players that were better than me - a key poker lesson in general, by the way.

I picked up a few ideal no-limit hands that all improved enough to bust opponents: 77 that made a full house on the turn, and 99 that turned into a beautiful nut-straight on the river to break an opponent who had slow-played QQ. He seemed to think that I had got very lucky to beat him. What he failed to comprehend was that he allowed me to get lucky, and that’s the far greater crime in poker. If he had re-raised me before the flop, on the flop, or on the turn I would have gladly yielded the pot to him as he had position. But he flat-called me three times, and the river spelled his doom, not to get too melodramatic or anything.

There were other players who made equally appalling mistakes. One insisted on showing his cards whenever he went all-in and failed to get any callers. It was always Ax, and he would accompany his generous gesture by saying that the only way to play AK or AQ is to go all-in because you don’t want to see flops with that kind of hand. I waited patiently for him for hours on end. Eventually, when there were four of us left and he raised all-in from the button I was happy to call him with 77. He showed A6, which was exactly what I hoped he had and that was the end of his event.

Before that gratifying moment I found myself the chip leader at the final table facing 9 dangerous opponents, and knowing that they only paid out the top 5 finishers. Jim was back at my table, several drinks spread around him, his chatter non-stop, loud, and frequently hilarious. The other players bristled at him, and were too stupid to realize that they were playing right into his hands. Meanwhile Tomer Benvenisti showed what a phenomenal player he is by doubling up twice when he was down to the felt. Suddenly he had a lot of chips again, and I considered these two poker champions to be huge dangers. At the same time I didn’t want to settle for a money-finish, even though this was a big no-limit tournament at the Bellagio and I could barely breathe every time I thought about it. I wanted to win, because I had played very well and put myself in position to win.

With a lot of chips in front of me and 45 of spades in the big blind I was faced with a tough decision when Tomer raised all-in from middle-position. Everyone folded to me. I could afford to see his bet because I would still have over 20,000 of the 100,000 chips in play if I lost. By this time we were 6-handed, which meant that if I eliminated him I would definitely be in the money. Furthermore, he’s a great player and you have to take your chances in no-limit to get rid of the players who are better than you, provided you have the chips to try. He turned over AT, which was about what I expected, but they were spades as well! My outs were minimal. Then the flop came: 4-K-J all hearts. I had made bottom pair and the 4s held up to knock him out. The atmosphere at the table was one of mutual respect and sheer professionalism. Funny how that is never the case when you play $4-$8 with the college kids who all think they’re trying out for a sequel to Rounders.

When we got down to three players we started to discuss the possibility of a deal. The money was very important to me, and the thought of splitting the pot three-ways for a very nice payday was far more pressing to me than the glory of winning the event. Both Jim and the other player, a very strong pro from California, agreed to a deal, but only after the button went around one more time. So, three more hands, which seemed fair as we all had roughly the same amount of chips in front of us, although Jim probably held a slight edge in terms of chips, and a huge edge in terms of overall ability.

The first hand of the three saw me in the big blind with K5 off-suit. Jim folded on the button and the California pro limped in. I checked. The flop came 5-5-7 with two clubs. He made a substantial bet at the pot. I thought about it for a while and eventually, reluctantly called. I was just waiting for him now. The turn brought a J of diamonds. Without hesitation he said he was all-in. I called and stood up quickly. He turned over A8 of clubs, and groaned when I showed him the 5. The river brought no club and he was out in 3rd place. Afterwards, when I went up to congratulate him, he was angry with himself for limping in, something he didn’t do throughout the event. He was right - a big bet pre-flop and I probably would have folded, because he had been so selectively aggressive before that. But once again he gave me room to play, and in no-limit poker that is often fatal.

We were now heads-up, and it occurred to me that I would prefer to do a deal with Jim rather than battle him for 1st place, especially since the prize money for first was double that for second. We agreed to a deal whereby my extra chips would be rewarded with extra cash, but he would be listed as the 1st place finisher in the event. I would much rather be paid 1st place prize money as opposed to being listed as the 1st place finisher. That’s because I am a new struggling pro whereas Jim has netted $300,000 in a single event’s work before and probably values the result slightly more than the cash. I guess I’m just a whore when it comes to these things.

The tournament was an enormous thrill for me because I proved to myself, and my long-suffering wife and family, that I can really compete at a very high level, and more than hold my own. Now, when I write strategy articles and dish out advice about playing poker I feel a little less fraudulent, and very slightly closer to becoming a poker expert. This is a game where you can never read enough, think enough, or push yourself enough, and the beauty of it all is that every day I play I find myself at a table where there are players whom I respect enough to stay away from, and any pursuit that both rewards you and keeps you humble like that has to be extraordinarily worthwhile.

Marc Weinberg
More about online poker at Online Poker Insider


Posted at 4:10 AM Permalink | 2 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Red Cross Wins Pot

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

The Red Cross have just won their first poker pot, courtesy of Poker.com and its charitable members. Last Wednesday, September 14, saw the first of Poker.com’s monthly charity
tournaments, with all proceeds being donated to the Red Cross Katrina appeal.

The tournament played host to 38 competitors who all donated $5 each towards the recent New Orleans disaster. With player donations totalling $190 Poker.com were more than happy to match the amount dollar for dollar (and more), thereby, combining to raise $450 for the Red Cross. It’s not enough to save the world just yet, but with the help of our players, it’s definitely a step in the right direction.

The charity event lasted nearly two and half hours with 153 hands being played, before the all conquering Charlottelake, managed to take out the event after some tight heads-up play against Chefmh.

Future charity tournament winners will also be given the opportunity to decide which organisation will receive that months donation. Unfortunately, the "Liam’s Weekend Party Foundation" has not been considered a reputable charity and will not feature in the list of possible choices....

Good Luck at the tables and hope to see you in the next charity tournament.

Poker.com 1st Charity Tournament Results
1st Charlottelake $152.00
2nd CHEFMH $95.00
3rd Cool2bme $57.00
4th Bubba55 $45.60
5t Jough728 $30.40
6th ElCielo
7th BeerDidBob
8th Surdilovics
9th BackDoc
10th Paul64

Liam @ Poker.com


Posted at 10:08 PM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Back home to Poker.com

Saturday, September 17, 2005

Our poker trip is coming to an end. I'm sitting in LAX after a few hours at the Hollywood Park Casino limit tables. We didn't do very well... We were probably playing a couple of limits below what we should have as everyone just seemed to call junk to the river. My most frustrating hand was when my pocket queens turned into a set only to lose to a rivered straight. She called 4 raises preflop with 6,7 off suit! It was a good way to kill some time while waiting for our plane though.

I had typed a heap more, but hit the wrong key on this crazy airport keyboard and deleted it all! So I'll post something else when we get back to Australia in about 20 hours.

kris @ poker.com


Posted at 9:38 PM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


Poker.com in 'The Vegas'

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Chris & I arrived in Las Vegas last Friday for some online gaming related meetings and conferences. Despited being jet-lagged for a few days, everything has gone well and the general consensus around the place is that people seem to love Poker.com! I've run into a few people around Vegas that play with us and even got some good tips for the site from a cabbie - Thanks Randy!

We haven't had much of chance to play any poker yet, but stopped by the Bellagio poker room the other night to see Phil Ivey, Johnny Chan and Jennifer Harmon playing in the private 'Bobby's Room'. Chris was playing at Harrah's this afternoon and saw Scotty Nyguen stroll in with a girl on each arm and we saw Daniel Negreanu at the Wynn. There are a few more pros than usual in town for the WSOP circuit event starting at Harrah's tomorrow.

I'm going to play in a tournament tomorrow hopefully, so wish me luck. It won't be the $10k event starting at Harrahs though - we'll just be watching that one! Most likely it will be a smaller buy in at a closeby casino.

One of the funny things about Vegas is the building are all visible from wherever you are, so you think you can walk everywhere at first. But I soon worked out that it's better to pay $5 for a cab than brave the crowds and streetside pamphlet assaults walking 20mins to a casino that 'looked like' it was only a block away.

That's it from Vegas for now - will give a tournament & poker pro sighting report tomorrow.

Kris @ Poker.com


Posted at 6:18 AM Permalink | 0 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


A Sit & Go Salary

Tuesday, September 06, 2005

One of the many advantages of playing poker online is that there is no room to hide from your true results. At the end of each month there is a crystal-clear ledger detailing your various deposits and withdrawals, and every online player knows whether or not they are winners at the game. They may not reveal the truth to you if you asked them, but at least you know that they know, and in poker that level of knowledge always counts for something.

So, eighteen months ago I knew that I was playing profitable poker overall. But I also knew that all of those profits were due to tournament play, while my overall record in ring games was dismal. In fact, my desire to play pot-limit Omaha and $10-$20 Hold'em had eaten away at almost a third of those profits.

I made the decision to specialize: I would focus exclusively on tournaments. My intention was to play in four sit and go (single table) tournaments every day, and one multi-table tournament. If I cashed in the first three sit 'n gos of the day I would leave it at that number. I would also only play poker five days a week, even though the temptation to wander into the study on an off-day and play some cards is as strong for me as it is for most of you reading this.

By playing in twenty single-table events and five multi-table events every week it was easy for me to set goals in terms of the results I needed to achieve in order to earn a decent living. If I finished in the top 3 60% of the time in the sit and gos, and won 20% of those events overall, I would be in good shape. All the single-table tournaments I play in are $100 + the poker room's rake. I would spend $2180 and get back $2000 (4 first place finishes) + $1200 (4 second place finishes) + $800 (4 third place finishes) for a net profit of $1820 a week.

I also wanted to play in multi-table tournaments at least once a day, but these generally featured lower entry fees, averaging out at $50 + rakes, and my aim there was 1 money finish out of 5. I knew that eventually I would do well in a big multi-table event and that playing in them on a daily basis at that level was a genuine overlay. As it was I estimated a $400 return for a $275 investment, and a total weekly "paycheck" of $1945 for my efforts. So far I have managed to win 3 multi-table tournaments with first prizes between $2000 and $3000 dollars, so that decision has paid off. I also find that single-table tournaments provide serious poker players with the best conditions to maximize their advantage over weaker players.

The main reason for this is that a single-table tournament is an enclosed environment, so the reads you get on your opponents are worth something as is the creation of a table persona. Their is value in false advertising in this format, just as there is in your local card room. The churn of players in money games can be a problem in this regard when playing online. You don't get value for deception as it were, but facing the same 9 opponents for an hour or two straight eradicates that issue.

This brings me to Poker.com, where I have recently started playing sit and go tournaments. Some of the features on the site provide genuine extra value to players, and top of my list is the unique hand history information. The way this is presented to players is worth its weight in gold, allowing you to visualize past hands instead of the agonizing scroll through of text, at best - some online poker rooms are way behind when it comes to this kind of functionality. I think fondly of one large network, which shall remain nameless, where hitting the "history" button (or their equivalent button) freezes your current game, terminates the window, and disconnects you. Tremendous! Don't look back while you're still in a hand over there, must be the message.

Over the next few weeks I intend to chronicle some of my more interesting performances, win or lose, and usually it is the losses that provide more instruction and insight both for me and you, gentle reader. I make plenty of mistakes, but I'm also learning and improving at a rapid rate, and in poker that is the only thing that matters in the long run.

Marc Weinberg
More about online poker at Online Poker Insider


Posted at 2:20 AM Permalink | 1 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum


We've recruited some Bloggers

Monday, September 05, 2005

We've been so busy here at Poker.com the past couple of weeks that we've struggled to post to the Poker Blog regularly, so we've invited some guest bloggers to contribute.

First up will be Marc Weinberg, senior editor of Online Poker Insider. Marc writes poker strategy articles for numerous other poker websites and for the past eighteen months he has made his living playing poker, almost exclusively online. He was educated at Oxford University (MPhil) and Johns Hopkins University (MA), where he received Masters degrees in English Literature and Creative Writing respectively, which goes a long way to explaining why he plays poker for a living!

Next week we'll have some trip reports from two Poker.com regulars who are making the trek to a European Poker Tour event in Barcelona - Bullitpete & FoxyUK.

And I don't think I've introduced Party Marty yet!. Marty helps with our servers, email, payment systems and other tech related things. He's also our social club president, hence the 'Party Marty' nickname. You'll see him chipping in on the forum from time to time and if you're ever lucky enough to attend one of our parties you might have the pleasure of meeting our very own party administrator in person.

kris @ poker.com


Posted at 8:02 PM Permalink | 2 comments | Talk on the Poker Forum

Powered by Blogger