America & Australia are supposedly two of the 'most free living' and 'lucky' nations in the world. Why is it that Australia is one of the few countries with anti-online gaming legislation and lawmakers in the USA are also trying to follow suit? Why does liberty & the idealistic nature of freedom not extend to the online world?
Bob Goodlatte is an idiot. He is trying to outlaw online gaming. Again... He's already failed once.
Every argument that these transparently selfish politicians have is fatally flawed.
Argument #1 - It is immoral to gamble online What the hell? How ridiculous is that. People can go to a dog track, buy a lottery ticket or go to an Indian owned casino and that is somehow better for your soul? Or how about the fact that any American can just jump on a flight to Las Vegas and within hours be gambling 24/7 with a hooker hanging off each arm, chugging down Jack Daniels and inhaling tar filled smoke. That is morally beneficial behaviour? Give me a break..... We don't want the citizens of our two great nations to be in the comfort of their home enjoying a 5c/10c game of poker whilst their children sleep soundly in the next room? No we want them destroying their lungs and livers whilst playing $25 minimum blackjack in a Casino 2 hours away so when little Johnny wakes up after having a nightmare he has no idea where Daddy is......
Argument #2 - Minors are at Risk
If any lawmaker wants to help minors, then there a million things they can do before they should even look at the problem of minors possibly playing online. How about doing something to improve the parenting skills of the nation so people can control their children a little better. Mum and Dad are too busy at the track or playing slots to know what their kids are doing....
Argument #3 - It's already illegal to gamble online
If online gambling is already illegal, then what is the point of your proposed law? The IRS allows US citizens to claim online gambling losses on their tax returns. To me that pretty much says that that the federal government has no problem with online gaming. A law written before the internet was even invented aimed at preventing the mob from running sportsbooks over telephone lines does not make online gaming illegal.
That's just a few ridiculous reasons I have seen. No politician ever seems to try and publicly address the real reason that they want to outlaw online gaming.
The real reason is that a bunch of money is heading offshore and there is nothing that they can currently do about it. They want every single cent that the American people spend to remain within the country, which is fair enough and I wholeheartedly agree that citizens should be able to benefit from their leisure spending in the form of tax money returning to the economy. If Poker.com was able to be set up as an American company, have US bank accounts, advertise to US citizens easily and pay a boatload of taxes to the US government, we would do it in an instant. But we're not allowed to do any of those things due to the continued backward thinking of some decision makers.
The guy in North Dakota had the right idea with his proposal to regulate online gaming. Of course he was still thinking too much with his wallet as most politicians do, and ultimately that probably made his ideas seem less palatable. He wanted to funnel all the revenue from licensing gaming companies into North Dakota's coffers. Right idea, wrong scope. It needs to be at the federal level.
The real answer is to regulate online gaming, but any conservative politician that suggests that his governement should regulate gambling rather than prohibit it would probably outrage a segment of his voters and lose millions of dollars in funding. Plus it is a huge and expensive job that nobody is yet willing to take on.
These politicians are largely looking out for their own interests, not the best interests of their electorate. Who sponsors these bills in the form of government donations and kickbacks? I know here in Australia it was the horse racing industry and the companies controlling Australia's lotteries that provided the funds to lauch the smear campaign against online gaming many years ago. I haven't done any thourough reasearch, but suspect it would be a very similar scenario in the USA. Anyone benefiting directly or indirectly from the current gambling revenue streams in the USA would be the major lobbyists against online gaming as it threatens their outdated and less convenient forms of gambling. They know that when given the option, people would much rather sit in their home and play for a few dollars and cents than drive to a smokey casino and be forced to play for 10s or 100s of dollars to pay for inflated infrastructure costs of a bricks and mortar casino or track.
Here in Australia the TAB (Company that takes the bets on horse racing) pulls 15% from the pool of funds bet on any race. 15%! That is a huge margin. These people and polticians have so much at risk if their ancient money making machines suffer a decline in interest.
Not only are the reasons for outlawing online gaming flawed and their motives suspect, but the actual laws they are proposing to introduce are ridiculously ineffective anyway. In Virginia they are planning to ban online gaming by stopping credit cards etc being used. Any American online poker player that has tried to use their credit card will know that this already happens due to credit card company rules! Not only are these politicians making laws for the wrong reasons, but their proposed laws are useless anyway! What a waste of time and money.....
And it is not like they are up against a few random websites that set up shop in the back of a van in Barbados. Online gaming companies are now publicly listed giants with massive resources at their disposal to fight any proposed laws that are not created for the right reasons or with the wrong implementation guidelines.
I have heard rumours from Australia's legal community that some of the politicians have wised up and realised that banning online gaming is not working and they instead need to regulate it sooner rather than later to ensure that the tax dollars and advertising dollars are not forever lost overseas. Hopefully soon there will be a revision of the Australian anti-gaming legislation as it is not working - there has never been a single person charged or case prosecuted because of it. It was a tremendous waste of money and time.
Don't let the same waste of time and money happen in the USA. Speak up and tell these idiots they need to regulate the industry at a federal level, not waste everyone's time incompetently trying to ban it state by state for ingenuous reasons. People have been gambling since the beginning of time and Poker is one of America's favorite pastimes and those facts are not going to change due to a clueless politician in Virginia who is not brave enough to tackle the real problems he is elected to solve.
People should be free to make their own choices. If gambling is immoral and harms minors, then try to ban
every form of gambling and see how many votes you get at the next election. Shut down Las Vegas, close the horse racing tracks and turn off the lottery. It is not right to single out online gaming as an evil or lesser gambling form, when it is obvious to most people that it is actually the most convenient and best entertainment option for the majority of the community.
Anyway, that's just my opinion. Have a nice weekend.
Kris @ Poker.com